Hey Conservatives, There’s Nothing “Delusional” About Being Trans
Chelsea Manning’s declaration yesterday that she didn’t want to be referred to as “Bradley” anymore and would like to live as a woman from now on instantly made her the most famous transgender person in the world. It also forced people to deal with the idea that some people feel like they are a man in a woman’s body, a woman in a man’s body, or a version of gender that doesn’t fit into the traditional male-female binary. This is not a new phenomenon—those who are neither precisely men nor women have existed across cultures and eras and have been both venerated and persecuted over the centuries. The simplest and most humane way to treat trans people is to just treat them as people, refer to them as the gender they want to be referred to as, and accept that unless you’re having sex with someone, it doesn’t matter what his or her genitals look like.  
For people who haven’t had much exposure to trans people, however, Manning’s announcement was “controversial” or “confusing.” (Even though it was already known that Manning was transgender.) The ultra-cis folks at Fox & Friends were all like, “Whaaaat? A man wants to be a woman? That is bizarre and I don’t think anyone understands what’s going on!” Other media outlets were reportedly struggling with which pronoun to use when referring to Manning. (It’s not thathard, guys. The VICE style guide says, “If someone is transgender or a transvestite, use the pronoun of his or her preferred gender.”)
Fox and Friends’ bewilderment is certainly insensitive but using the wrong pronoun or admitting that you don’t understand transgender issues isn’t all that vicious or transphobic, necessarily. Enter the National Review’s Kevin D. Williamson, who just wrote a post titled “Bradley Manning Is Not a Woman” and subtitled “Pronouns and delusions do not trump biology.”
Continue

Hey Conservatives, There’s Nothing “Delusional” About Being Trans

Chelsea Manning’s declaration yesterday that she didn’t want to be referred to as “Bradley” anymore and would like to live as a woman from now on instantly made her the most famous transgender person in the world. It also forced people to deal with the idea that some people feel like they are a man in a woman’s body, a woman in a man’s body, or a version of gender that doesn’t fit into the traditional male-female binary. This is not a new phenomenon—those who are neither precisely men nor women have existed across cultures and eras and have been both venerated and persecuted over the centuries. The simplest and most humane way to treat trans people is to just treat them as people, refer to them as the gender they want to be referred to as, and accept that unless you’re having sex with someone, it doesn’t matter what his or her genitals look like.  

For people who haven’t had much exposure to trans people, however, Manning’s announcement was “controversial” or “confusing.” (Even though it was already known that Manning was transgender.) The ultra-cis folks at Fox & Friends were all like, “Whaaaat? A man wants to be a woman? That is bizarre and I don’t think anyone understands what’s going on!” Other media outlets were reportedly struggling with which pronoun to use when referring to Manning. (It’s not thathard, guys. The VICE style guide says, “If someone is transgender or a transvestite, use the pronoun of his or her preferred gender.”)

Fox and Friends’ bewilderment is certainly insensitive but using the wrong pronoun or admitting that you don’t understand transgender issues isn’t all that vicious or transphobic, necessarily. Enter the National Review’s Kevin D. Williamson, who just wrote a post titled “Bradley Manning Is Not a Woman” and subtitled “Pronouns and delusions do not trump biology.”

Continue

Notes:

  1. erasedandignored reblogged this from medminoritiesia
  2. medminoritiesia reblogged this from vicemag
  3. andy6xm reblogged this from vicemag
  4. pag-asaharibon reblogged this from vicemag and added:
    Interesting how since Chelsea made her public statement how these GOP and libertarian people have been quiet on it....
  5. skipping2hell reblogged this from vicemag
  6. jordans-n-frybread reblogged this from vicemag
  7. thenonbinarytrekkie reblogged this from sancho108 and added:
    Seriously. Check your shit guys.
  8. the-red-headed-slut reblogged this from juliet-echo-alpha
  9. caguilar649 reblogged this from vicemag
  10. gold-coast-ghost reblogged this from meheeeen
  11. dontpressthatbutton reblogged this from vicemag
  12. jordanwaynelong reblogged this from emily-sara
  13. juliet-echo-alpha reblogged this from vicemag
  14. aydenisabadkid reblogged this from vicemag
  15. kevaciouus reblogged this from vicemag
  16. manofbrass reblogged this from espill
  17. intergalactic-smuggler reblogged this from mckoootiesassgrass
  18. cthulhu-with-a-fire-extinguisher reblogged this from vicemag
  19. mckoootiesassgrass reblogged this from mobile-homie
  20. shitfacedanon reblogged this from vicegrips